I guess that would depend on how one defines
machine.
I think if we are going to tackle this undertaking then we might wish have some robust encapsulations that distinguish between divergent encapsulations. It would be unfortunate if we cultivated indifference about machines too early on in the process. So, while I agree wholeheartedly with goals of this undertaking, "we" run the risk of simply repackaging concepts.
My partner and I have created a lexicon as devoid of conceptualism as we can make it for this iteration of the model (the
RMCM).
While we hold primacy on the lexicon and all content of the model, please enjoy the liberty to use all or part of our model in this undertaking.
Nice to meet you and look forward to a fruitful and successful collaboration given that you are comfortable with us.